FB Financial vs ServisFirst Bancshares
FBK and SFBS side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBK and SFBS compare
FB Financial is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as ServisFirst Bancshares ($2.7B against $2.2B).
On earnings, FB Financial is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 13.0× for ServisFirst Bancshares.
FB Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.8% versus 24.5% for ServisFirst Bancshares).
ServisFirst Bancshares keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 51.7% compared with 33.3% at FB Financial.
Both pay dividends: FB Financial yields 1.2% and ServisFirst Bancshares 1.9%.
ServisFirst Bancshares scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for FB Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBK | SFBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.7B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $54.63 | $40.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.98% | 14.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 18.5% | −0.69% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 1,594 | 666 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 13.0× |
| P/S | 3.9× | 3.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.8× | – |
| PEG | – | 4.13 |
| FCF yield | 6.3% | – |
| Fair value | $55.89 | $58.14 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% | 29.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 36.8% (better) | 24.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.27% | 8.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 125% (better) | 34.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 110% (better) | 34.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 10.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 33.3% | 51.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 24.6% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.9% | 17.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.23 | 0.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 18.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 16.1% (better) | 13.8% |
| Buyback yield | 8.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 9.3% (better) | 1.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.2% | 148% |
| Held by insiders | 24.3% | 6.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $542K (better) | −$4.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 6.7% |
Go deeper
- FBK stock overview
- FBK income statement
- FBK valuation and score
- SFBS stock overview
- SFBS income statement
- SFBS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.