StockData

Fortress Biotech vs Roivant Sciences

FBIO and ROIV side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FBIO and ROIV compare

Roivant Sciences is the larger company, worth 413 times as much as Fortress Biotech ($28.6B against $69.1M).

Roivant Sciences grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (102% versus 12.3% for Fortress Biotech).

Fortress Biotech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 143% compared with −838% at Roivant Sciences.

Fortress Biotech scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Roivant Sciences), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFBIOROIV
Size and price
Market cap$69.1M$28.6B
Share price$1.88$39.53
Change, 1 year−28.2%85.4%
Change, 5 years−95.9%394%
Beta (5Y)1.370.85
Employees78721
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)8
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score46 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.0× (better)695×
P/B0.4× (better)7.1×
FCF yield–−0.12%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)12.3%102% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.8% (better)−19.1%
Net income growth (TTM)2411%–
Profitability
Gross margin66.2%–
Operating margin−42.5% (better)−1358%
Net margin143% (better)−838%
FCF margin–−81.2%
Return on equity92.8% (better)−8.2%
Return on invested capital−132%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.11 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−3.2×–
Current ratio2.9315.56 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.2545.37 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions15.9%78.1%
Held by insiders31.6%13.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$798M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float–7.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.