Fortune Brands Innovations vs Spectrum Brands
FBIN and SPB side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBIN and SPB compare
Fortune Brands Innovations is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Spectrum Brands ($5.9B against $2.0B).
Spectrum Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.82% versus −3.0% for Fortune Brands Innovations).
Both pay dividends: Fortune Brands Innovations yields 2.1% and Spectrum Brands 2.1%.
Spectrum Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 6 for Fortune Brands Innovations), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBIN | SPB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $49.17 | $88.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.99% | 65.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.2% | −16.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 10K | 3,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 27.0× |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 34.0× | 11.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.6× | 7.0× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.89 |
| FCF yield | 9.4% | 14.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $23.70 | $121.48 |
| Margin of safety | −107% | 27.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.0% | 0.82% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 22.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.9% | 12.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.0% (better) | 39.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.4% (better) | 4.0% |
| Net margin | – | 2.8% |
| FCF margin | 12.7% (better) | 10.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 4.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.85 | 1.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | 3.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.83 | 2.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.64 | 2.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 2.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 55.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.60% | 2.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 4.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 6.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 119% |
| Held by insiders | 8.9% | 5.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $30.6M (better) | $182K |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 20.4% |
Go deeper
- FBIN stock overview
- FBIN income statement
- FBIN valuation and score
- SPB stock overview
- SPB income statement
- SPB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.