StockData

Fate Therapeutics vs Molecular Partners

FATE and MOLN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FATE and MOLN compare

Fate Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−33.4% versus −100% for Molecular Partners).

Fate Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for Molecular Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFATEMOLN
Size and price
Market cap$161M–
Share price$1.34$3.01
Change, 1 year19.6%−25.3%
Change, 5 years−97.6%−71.2%
Beta (5Y)2.400.88
Employees16134
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)1
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S33.8×–
P/B1.2×–
FCF yield−66.5%–
Fair value$1.13–
Margin of safety−18.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−33.4% (better)−100%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−26.7%–
Profitability
Operating margin−2760%–
Net margin−2620%–
FCF margin−2249%–
Return on equity−67.8%–
Return on invested capital−1647%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−11.5×
Current ratio4.417.27 (better)
Altman Z-score−9.87–
Piotroski F-score3–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions59.9%8.9%
Held by insiders25.7%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$336K–
Short interest, % of float11.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.