Entravision Communications vs E.W. Scripps
EVC and SSP side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EVC and SSP compare
Entravision Communications is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as E.W. Scripps ($920M against $348M).
Entravision Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (87.0% versus −8.9% for E.W. Scripps).
Entravision Communications pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; E.W. Scripps does not pay one.
Entravision Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for E.W. Scripps), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EVC | SSP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $920M | $348M |
| Share price | $9.97 | $3.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 241% | 33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.2% | −81.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 1,025 | 4,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.2× | – |
| P/S | 1.2× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 9.0× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 15.2× | 2.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.6% | 42.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.02 | $11.92 |
| Margin of safety | −98.5% | 68.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 87.0% (better) | −8.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% (better) | 3.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −5071% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.8% (better) | 42.1% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% (better) | −48.4% |
| Net margin | – | −54.2% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% (better) | 7.0% |
| Return on equity | – | −163% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.8% (better) | −25.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.50 (better) | 17.23 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.89 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.4× (better) | −4.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 1.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.71 (better) | −0.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.7% | 58.9% |
| Held by insiders | 23.5% | 28.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.3M | $7.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- EVC stock overview
- EVC income statement
- EVC valuation and score
- SSP stock overview
- SSP income statement
- SSP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.