Entravision Communications vs Gray Media
EVC and GTN side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EVC and GTN compare
Entravision Communications is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Gray Media ($874M against $617M).
On earnings, Gray Media is cheaper: it trades at 20.0× trailing earnings, against 31.6× for Entravision Communications.
Entravision Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (87.0% versus 0.69% for Gray Media).
Both pay dividends: Entravision Communications yields 2.1% and Gray Media 5.3%.
Gray Media scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Entravision Communications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EVC | GTN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $874M | $617M |
| Share price | $9.47 | $5.99 |
| Change, 1 year | 224% | 22.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 19.9% | −72.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 1,025 | 9,165 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.6× | 20.0× (better) |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 8.6× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× | 7.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.4× | 2.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.9% | 41.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.13 | $20.64 |
| Margin of safety | −84.6% | 71.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 87.0% (better) | 0.69% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% (better) | 5.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −34.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −33.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | 17.8% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 1.8% |
| FCF margin | 7.7% (better) | 7.6% |
| Return on equity | – | 2.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.8% (better) | 6.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.50 (better) | 2.63 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.89 (better) | 6.78 |
| Interest coverage | 4.4× (better) | 1.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 0.92 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.63 (better) | 0.72 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 5.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 54.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.7% | 73.2% |
| Held by insiders | 23.5% | 17.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.3M | −$251K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | – |
Go deeper
- EVC stock overview
- EVC income statement
- EVC valuation and score
- GTN stock overview
- GTN income statement
- GTN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.