StockData

EUDA Health vs Charming Medical

EUDA and MCTA side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EUDA and MCTA compare

EUDA Health grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (70.0% versus −22.7% for Charming Medical).

Charming Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.47% compared with −40.7% at EUDA Health.

EUDA Health scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Charming Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEUDAMCTA
Size and price
Share price$15.80$29.35
Change, 1 year−74.8%33.3%
Beta (5Y)0.350.85
Employees12329
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score11
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)70.0% (better)−22.7%
Net income growth (TTM)–−102%
EPS growth (TTM)–−100%
Profitability
Gross margin43.9%99.3% (better)
Operating margin−36.3%−0.61% (better)
Net margin−40.7%−0.47% (better)
FCF margin−36.7%−32.4% (better)
Return on equity−245%−0.87% (better)
Return on invested capital−227%−13.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.04
Interest coverage−10.8×−1.9× (better)
Current ratio2.53 (better)1.89
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.24%
Held by insiders24.4%71.9%
Short interest, % of float–11.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.