Element Solutions vs Fuller H B
ESI and FUL side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ESI and FUL compare
Element Solutions is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Fuller H B ($8.3B against $2.7B).
On earnings, Fuller H B is cheaper: it trades at 14.1× trailing earnings, against 40.1× for Element Solutions.
Element Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.6% versus 1.5% for Fuller H B).
Element Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 5.6% at Fuller H B.
Both pay dividends: Element Solutions yields 0.94% and Fuller H B 1.9%.
Fuller H B scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Element Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ESI | FUL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.3B | $2.7B |
| Share price | $34.05 | $50.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.7% | −12.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 36.1% | −33.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 5,200 | 7,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.1× | 14.1× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.5× | 8.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 45.2× | 27.3× (better) |
| PEG | 30.84 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.2% | 3.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $24.84 | $103.58 |
| Margin of safety | −37.1% | 51.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 39.6% (better) | 1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −14.4% | 72.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.1% | 71.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.4% (better) | 3.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.6% (better) | 32.3% |
| Operating margin | 11.7% | – |
| Net margin | 5.9% (better) | 5.6% |
| FCF margin | 5.2% (better) | 2.8% |
| Return on equity | 7.4% | 9.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.72 (better) | 0.95 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.21 (better) | 3.35 |
| Current ratio | 2.78 (better) | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.52 (better) | 1.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 38.4% | 26.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 45.0% (better) | 7.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.94% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 5.8% | 0.65% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.9M | $914K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- ESI stock overview
- ESI income statement
- ESI valuation and score
- FUL stock overview
- FUL income statement
- FUL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.