Essential Properties Realty Trust vs Independence Realty Trust
EPRT and IRT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPRT and IRT compare
Essential Properties Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Independence Realty Trust ($6.1B against $3.5B).
On earnings, Essential Properties Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 22.6× trailing earnings, against 57.5× for Independence Realty Trust.
Essential Properties Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.4% versus 3.1% for Independence Realty Trust).
Essential Properties Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 41.0% compared with 9.2% at Independence Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Essential Properties Realty Trust yields 4.5% and Independence Realty Trust 4.7%.
Essential Properties Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Independence Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPRT | IRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.1B | $3.5B |
| Share price | $27.78 | $14.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.1% | −9.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −0.54% | −41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 56 | 904 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.6× (better) | 57.5× |
| P/S | 9.6× | 5.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× | – |
| PEG | 2.53 | – |
| Fair value | $28.02 | $12.64 |
| Margin of safety | 0.87% (better) | −18.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.4% (better) | 3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.9% (better) | 25.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.2% | 177% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −0.81% | 160% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.8% (better) | 8.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 60.6% | – |
| Net margin | 41.0% (better) | 9.2% |
| Return on equity | 6.3% (better) | 1.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.1× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.41 (better) | 0.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.5% | 4.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 100% | 265% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.4% |
| Buyback yield | −11.0% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −6.4% | 6.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 114% | 99.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.55% | 0.79% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.5M | −$96.9K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- EPRT stock overview
- EPRT income statement
- EPRT valuation and score
- IRT stock overview
- IRT income statement
- IRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.