Enlight Renewable Energy vs Ormat Technologies
ENLT and ORA side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENLT and ORA compare
Enlight Renewable Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.3% versus 28.6% for Ormat Technologies).
Enlight Renewable Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.0% compared with 11.1% at Ormat Technologies.
Ormat Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.53%; Enlight Renewable Energy does not pay one.
Ormat Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Enlight Renewable Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENLT | ORA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $5.6B |
| Share price | $66.07 | $90.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 67.1% | −18.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 3271% | 12.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.09 | 0.57 |
| Employees | 42 | 1,512 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 41.9× |
| P/S | – | 4.6× |
| P/B | – | 2.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.5× |
| PEG | – | 2.10 |
| FCF yield | – | −4.2% |
| Fair value | – | $91.38 |
| Margin of safety | – | 1.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.3% (better) | 28.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 47.4% (better) | 7.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 199% (better) | 0.79% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 178% (better) | −0.92% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 4.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 72.5% (better) | 28.4% |
| Operating margin | 68.0% (better) | 16.7% |
| Net margin | 27.0% (better) | 11.1% |
| FCF margin | −313% | −19.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.9% (better) | 5.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.7% (better) | 8.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.26 | 0.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.24 | −0.48 |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× (better) | 1.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.12 (better) | 0.92 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.53% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.53% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.2% | 88.0% |
| Held by insiders | 34.7% | 0.28% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.8M | −$6.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | 10.5% |
Go deeper
- ENLT stock overview
- ENLT income statement
- ENLT valuation and score
- ORA stock overview
- ORA income statement
- ORA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.