StockData

Etoiles Capital vs Greenpro Capital

EFTY and GRNQ side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EFTY and GRNQ compare

Etoiles Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus 8.1% for Greenpro Capital).

Etoiles Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.8% compared with −116% at Greenpro Capital.

Greenpro Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for Etoiles Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEFTYGRNQ
Size and price
Market cap–$13.3M
Share price$15.02$7.33
Change, 1 year0.00%−57.9%
Change, 5 years–−91.9%
Beta (5Y)0.120.09
Employees2441
StockData Score
Total score28 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score01 (better)
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–4.3×
P/B–0.7×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)27.6% (better)8.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−1.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−118%–
EPS growth (TTM)−117%–
Profitability
Gross margin–52.6%
Operating margin−0.99% (better)−110%
Net margin−4.8% (better)−116%
FCF margin−49.6%–
Return on equity−4.6% (better)−29.3%
Return on invested capital–−44.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−0.6× (better)−4735.7×
Current ratio4.3715.92 (better)
Altman Z-score–7.03
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.41%0.78%
Held by insiders51.2%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–$400K
Short interest, % of float5.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.