Everforth vs TrueBlue
EFOR and TBI side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EFOR and TBI compare
Everforth is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as TrueBlue ($1.5B against $378M).
TrueBlue grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.4% versus 0.04% for Everforth).
Everforth keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with −2.6% at TrueBlue.
Everforth scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for TrueBlue), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EFOR | TBI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $378M |
| Share price | $35.55 | $12.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.8% | 141% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.7% | −52.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 3,320 | 3,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 13.4% (better) | −19.1% |
| Fair value | $59.07 | $14.77 |
| Margin of safety | 39.8% (better) | 16.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.04% | 12.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% (better) | −2.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −44.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −7.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.3% (better) | 20.6% |
| Operating margin | 4.6% (better) | −2.0% |
| Net margin | 1.7% (better) | −2.6% |
| FCF margin | 4.9% (better) | −4.1% |
| Return on equity | 3.7% (better) | −15.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% (better) | −8.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.38 |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.13 | 2.33 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.08 | 4.02 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 7.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 85.1% |
| Held by insiders | 3.1% | 7.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.9M (better) | −$35.6K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.5% | 1.6% |
Go deeper
- EFOR stock overview
- EFOR income statement
- EFOR valuation and score
- TBI stock overview
- TBI income statement
- TBI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.