Everbright Digital vs Wellchange
EDHL and WCT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EDHL and WCT compare
Everbright Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−32.6% versus −41.6% for Wellchange).
Everbright Digital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −121% compared with −543% at Wellchange.
Everbright Digital scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Wellchange), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EDHL | WCT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $6.81 | $2.86 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.8% | −99.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.26 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 6 | 8 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −32.6% (better) | −41.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −692% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −160% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.4% (better) | 42.7% |
| Operating margin | – | −469% |
| Net margin | −121% (better) | −543% |
| Return on equity | −70.8% (better) | −91.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −72.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.04 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −508.5× |
| Current ratio | 3.69 | 4.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.52% | – |
Go deeper
- EDHL stock overview
- EDHL income statement
- EDHL valuation and score
- WCT stock overview
- WCT income statement
- WCT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.