Krispy Kreme vs J&J Snack Foods
DNUT and JJSF side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DNUT and JJSF compare
J&J Snack Foods is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Krispy Kreme ($1.7B against $680M).
J&J Snack Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.7% versus −7.5% for Krispy Kreme).
J&J Snack Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.2% compared with −5.9% at Krispy Kreme.
J&J Snack Foods pays a dividend yielding 3.6%; Krispy Kreme does not pay one.
J&J Snack Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 4 for Krispy Kreme), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DNUT | JJSF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $680M | $1.7B |
| Share price | $3.92 | $88.39 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.7% | 7.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.6% | −38.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 23K | 1,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 34.0× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.1× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.9× | 17.9× (better) |
| PEG | – | 3.10 |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 5.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $3.50 | $92.95 |
| Margin of safety | −12.1% | 4.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.5% | −4.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% | 9.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −41.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −39.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 28.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 31.3% |
| Operating margin | −2.2% | 3.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.9% | 3.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.3% | 6.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −13.1% | 5.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −1.6% | 5.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.41 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 9.42 (better) | −0.26 |
| Interest coverage | – | 27.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 2.34 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.13 | 4.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 124% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.13% | 4.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.13% | 8.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.4% | 80.0% |
| Held by insiders | 90.7% | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $3.0M (better) | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 114% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- DNUT stock overview
- DNUT income statement
- DNUT valuation and score
- JJSF stock overview
- JJSF income statement
- JJSF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.