DNOW vs Weatherford International
DNOW and WFRD side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DNOW and WFRD compare
Weatherford International is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as DNOW ($6.3B against $2.5B).
DNOW grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (96.8% versus −5.7% for Weatherford International).
Weatherford International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.6% compared with −3.9% at DNOW.
Weatherford International pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; DNOW does not pay one.
Weatherford International scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for DNOW), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DNOW | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $6.3B |
| Share price | $13.90 | $86.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.3% | 19.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 49.5% | 196% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 5,300 | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.4× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.6× |
| P/FCF | 12.4× | 10.8× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.10 |
| FCF yield | 8.1% | 9.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $15.56 | $106.01 |
| Margin of safety | 10.6% | 18.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 96.8% (better) | −5.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −338% | 0.00% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 1.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −3.9% | 12.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.9% | 8.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.2% | 12.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −11.3% | 23.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −10.1% | 25.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.76 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.37 |
| Current ratio | 2.08 (better) | 2.04 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.08 | 2.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 19.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% (better) | 0.97% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 2.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.5M (better) | −$18.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 5.8% |
Go deeper
- DNOW stock overview
- DNOW income statement
- DNOW valuation and score
- WFRD stock overview
- WFRD income statement
- WFRD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.