Deckers Outdoor vs On
DECK and ONON side by side, both in rubber and miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DECK and ONON compare
On grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.0% versus 6.3% for Deckers Outdoor).
Deckers Outdoor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.0% compared with 6.8% at On.
Deckers Outdoor scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 7 for On), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DECK | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.8B | – |
| Share price | $88.38 | $34.71 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.7% | −0.72% |
| Change, 5 years | 22.0% | −22.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.72 |
| Employees | 6,000 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.7× | – |
| P/S | 2.1× | – |
| P/B | 5.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.2× | – |
| PEG | 0.40 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.9% | – |
| Fair value | $148.10 | – |
| Margin of safety | 40.3% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% | 30.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.5% | 47.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.4% (better) | −15.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.9% | 62.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 23.6% (better) | 12.5% |
| Net margin | 19.0% (better) | 6.8% |
| FCF margin | 18.9% (better) | 9.5% |
| Return on equity | 44.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 96.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | 280× (better) | 12.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.72 | 2.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.15 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 10.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 10.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 70.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.90% | 37.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | $9.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | – |
Go deeper
- DECK stock overview
- DECK income statement
- DECK valuation and score
- ONON stock overview
- ONON income statement
- ONON valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.