StockData

Digital Brands vs J-Long

DBGI and JL side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DBGI and JL compare

J-Long grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus −33.6% for Digital Brands).

J-Long keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.5% compared with −768% at Digital Brands.

J-Long scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for Digital Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDBGIJL
Size and price
Market cap$136K–
Share price$0.146$4.00
Change, 1 year−100.0%−6.8%
Change, 5 years−100%–
Beta (5Y)0.94−0.86
Employees33101
StockData Score
Total score16 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score03 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
P/B0.3×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−33.6%8.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.1%–
Net income growth (TTM)–6.6%
EPS growth (TTM)–−6.3%
Profitability
Gross margin−2.8%34.0% (better)
Operating margin−699%7.0% (better)
Net margin−768%6.5% (better)
FCF margin–7.6%
Return on equity−1162%–
Return on invested capital−277%–
Financial health
Debt / equity32.09–
Net debt / EBITDA–−3.98
Interest coverage−81.4×198× (better)
Current ratio0.582.84 (better)
Altman Z-score−8.34–
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%–
Held by insiders73.7%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$748K–
Short interest, % of float48.2%0.18%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.