StockData

Digital Brands vs 707 Cayman

DBGI and JEM side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DBGI and JEM compare

707 Cayman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.9% versus −33.6% for Digital Brands).

707 Cayman keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −38.3% compared with −768% at Digital Brands.

707 Cayman scores higher on the StockData Score (2 against 1 for Digital Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDBGIJEM
Size and price
Market cap$136K–
Share price$0.146$2.30
Change, 1 year−100.0%−96.8%
Change, 5 years−100%–
Beta (5Y)0.94−0.86
Employees3317
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score01 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
P/B0.3×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−33.6%21.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.1%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−649%
EPS growth (TTM)–−603%
Profitability
Gross margin−2.8%19.9% (better)
Operating margin−699%−37.5% (better)
Net margin−768%−38.3% (better)
FCF margin–−9.7%
Return on equity−1162%−148% (better)
Return on invested capital−277% (better)−2805%
Financial health
Debt / equity32.09–
Interest coverage−81.4× (better)−150.7×
Current ratio0.584.32 (better)
Altman Z-score−8.34–
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%–
Held by insiders73.7%0.83%
Insider net buying, 12 months$748K (better)$165K
Short interest, % of float48.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.