StockData

CID Holdco vs Algorhythm

DAIC and RIME side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DAIC and RIME compare

CID Holdco and Algorhythm are about the same size, with market caps of $2.3M and $2.5M.

Algorhythm keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −176% compared with −277% at CID Holdco.

Algorhythm scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for CID Holdco), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDAICRIME
Size and price
Market cap$2.3M$2.5M
Share price$0.984$0.145
Change, 1 year−98.4%−93.8%
Change, 5 years–−100.0%
Beta (5Y)1.68−0.74
Employees6849
StockData Score
Total score15 (better)
Valuation score11
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score04 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4×0.3× (better)
FCF yield–−439%
Growth
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−37.0%
Profitability
Gross margin42.8% (better)−26.3%
Operating margin−253%−149% (better)
Net margin−277%−176% (better)
FCF margin–−127%
Financial health
Interest coverage−11.4×–
Current ratio0.270.90 (better)
Altman Z-score−19.65−7.37 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–7.9%
Held by insiders–56.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$130K–
Short interest, % of float–23.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.