CaliberCos vs Belpointe PREP
CWD and OZ side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWD and OZ compare
Belpointe PREP is the larger company, worth 31 times as much as CaliberCos ($124M against $4.0M).
Belpointe PREP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (163% versus −31.3% for CaliberCos).
CaliberCos keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −117% compared with −212% at Belpointe PREP.
Belpointe PREP scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 1 for CaliberCos), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWD | OZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.0M | $124M |
| Share price | $0.384 | $30.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −87.3% | −50.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −69.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.43 | 0.12 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 6.5× |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −31.3% | 163% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | −117% (better) | −212% |
| Return on equity | −6587% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | −0.60 | 0.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.9% | 31.5% |
| Held by insiders | 11.7% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.0% | 1.0% |
Go deeper
- CWD stock overview
- CWD income statement
- CWD valuation and score
- OZ stock overview
- OZ income statement
- OZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.