StockData

Civeo vs Studio City International

CVEO and MSC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CVEO and MSC compare

Civeo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.6% versus 8.7% for Studio City International).

Civeo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.1% compared with −8.5% at Studio City International.

Civeo scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Studio City International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCVEOMSC
Size and price
Market cap$369M–
Share price$35.70$0.957
Change, 1 year61.9%−74.3%
Change, 5 years70.4%−86.4%
Beta (5Y)0.400.02
Employees2,1005,286
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)3
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score01 (better)
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
P/B2.6×–
EV/EBITDA6.2×–
P/FCF12.5×–
FCF yield8.0%–
Fair value$43.02–
Margin of safety17.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)12.6% (better)8.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average3.8%69.8% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin23.3%–
Operating margin3.0%10.1% (better)
Net margin−1.1% (better)−8.5%
FCF margin4.2%–
Return on equity−4.7% (better)−10.5%
Return on invested capital3.1% (better)2.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity1.48 (better)3.86
Net debt / EBITDA2.11 (better)6.79
Interest coverage1.3× (better)0.6×
Current ratio1.71 (better)0.73
Altman Z-score−0.72–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Buyback yield11.3%–
Shareholder yield11.3%–
Ownership
Held by institutions90.1%5.2%
Held by insiders16.8%55.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$13.3M$229K (better)
Short interest, % of float13.5%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.