CubeSmart vs Cousins Properties
CUBE and CUZ side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CUBE and CUZ compare
CubeSmart is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Cousins Properties ($10.1B against $4.9B).
On earnings, CubeSmart is cheaper: it trades at 29.9× trailing earnings, against 329× for Cousins Properties.
Cousins Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 3.3% for CubeSmart).
Both pay dividends: CubeSmart yields 4.7% and Cousins Properties 4.3%.
CubeSmart scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Cousins Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CUBE | CUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.1B | $4.9B |
| Share price | $45.14 | $29.64 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.2% | 14.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.7% | −24.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 3,121 | 351 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.9× (better) | 329× |
| P/S | 8.8× | 4.7× (better) |
| P/B | 4.1× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.3× |
| PEG | 7.10 | – |
| Fair value | $35.87 | $34.75 |
| Margin of safety | −25.8% | 14.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.3% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −74.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −3.2% (better) | −74.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | −31.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.6% | 68.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 68.3% |
| Net margin | – | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 0.32% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.0× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.29 (better) | 1.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% (better) | 4.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 1445% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.5% (better) | 1.3% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% (better) | 4.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.88% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.9M | −$178K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- CUBE stock overview
- CUBE income statement
- CUBE valuation and score
- CUZ stock overview
- CUZ income statement
- CUZ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.