StockData

Cytosorbents vs Nephros

CTSO and NEPH side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CTSO and NEPH compare

Cytosorbents is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as Nephros ($336M against $33.3M).

Nephros grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.4% versus 3.1% for Cytosorbents).

Nephros keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.9% compared with −48.9% at Cytosorbents.

Nephros scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 2 for Cytosorbents), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCTSONEPH
Size and price
Market cap$336M$33.3M
Share price$5.34$3.07
Change, 1 year−63.0%−28.4%
Change, 5 years−94.9%−58.6%
Beta (5Y)0.960.58
Employees12936
StockData Score
Total score213 (better)
Valuation score04 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score12 (better)
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–17.1×
P/S9.0×1.5× (better)
EV/EBITDA–14.8×
FCF yield−2.8%–
Fair value–$4.25
Margin of safety–27.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.1%20.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.0%17.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–29.0%
EPS growth (TTM)–38.5%
Profitability
Gross margin71.6% (better)60.5%
Operating margin−34.7%8.5% (better)
Net margin−48.9%8.9% (better)
FCF margin−25.0%–
Return on equity−336%–
Return on invested capital−73.4%–
Financial health
Current ratio0.665.50 (better)
Altman Z-score−7.07−3.01 (better)
Piotroski F-score37 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.3%48.9%
Held by insiders2.5%9.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$269K–
Short interest, % of float0.22%0.12%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.