StockData

Claritev vs Priority Technology

CTEV and PRTH side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CTEV and PRTH compare

Priority Technology is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Claritev ($651M against $478M).

Priority Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus 6.9% for Claritev).

Priority Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Claritev), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCTEVPRTH
Size and price
Market cap$478M$651M
Share price$28.21$7.90
Change, 1 year−51.2%41.8%
Change, 5 years−80.0%28.5%
Beta (5Y)1.241.01
Employees3,0001,200
StockData Score
Total score49 (better)
Valuation score14 (better)
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score11
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–16.1×
P/S0.5× (better)0.6×
EV/EBITDA118×7.4× (better)
P/FCF–6.0×
FCF yield−5.8%16.7% (better)
Fair value–$13.98
Margin of safety–43.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.9%10.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.58%18.7% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)–−7.5%
EPS growth, 5Y average–12.3%
Profitability
Gross margin72.8% (better)39.1%
Operating margin4.2%13.2% (better)
Net margin−27.1%–
FCF margin−2.7%10.6% (better)
Return on invested capital0.78%12.7% (better)
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA107.004.30 (better)
Interest coverage0.1×1.6× (better)
Current ratio1.15 (better)1.10
Altman Z-score−0.470.74 (better)
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−0.38%–
Shareholder yield−0.38%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions91.0%23.6%
Held by insiders50.2%59.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$4.0M (better)−$23.8K
Short interest, % of float9.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.