Carriage Services vs Security National Financial
CSV and SNFCA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CSV and SNFCA compare
Carriage Services is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Security National Financial ($452M against $248M).
On earnings, Security National Financial is cheaper: it trades at 7.8× trailing earnings, against 9.7× for Carriage Services.
Carriage Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.3% versus −4.2% for Security National Financial).
Carriage Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 9.0% at Security National Financial.
Carriage Services pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Security National Financial does not pay one.
Carriage Services scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 12 for Security National Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CSV | SNFCA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $452M | $248M |
| Share price | $28.47 | $9.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.1% | 17.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.0% | 13.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 2,321 | 1,243 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.7× | 7.8× (better) |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.8× | 2.2× (better) |
| PEG | 1.32 (better) | 1.94 |
| FCF yield | 8.5% | 44.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $50.15 | $13.56 |
| Margin of safety | 43.2% (better) | 33.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% (better) | −4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% (better) | −6.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4.4% | 7.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.4% | 12.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.6% (better) | −14.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.1% | 98.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 22.5% | – |
| Net margin | 11.3% (better) | 9.0% |
| FCF margin | 9.2% | 33.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 17.7% (better) | 6.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.02 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.45 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.06 (better) | 0.55 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 15.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.54% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.54% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.0% | 34.3% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$94.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 0.82% |
Go deeper
- CSV stock overview
- CSV income statement
- CSV valuation and score
- SNFCA stock overview
- SNFCA income statement
- SNFCA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.