Carriage Services vs Regis
CSV and RGS side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CSV and RGS compare
Carriage Services is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as Regis ($452M against $59.2M).
On earnings, Carriage Services is cheaper: it trades at 9.7× trailing earnings, against 11.2× for Regis.
Carriage Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.3% versus −1.4% for Regis).
Carriage Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 2.8% at Regis.
Carriage Services pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Regis does not pay one.
Carriage Services scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 6 for Regis), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CSV | RGS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $452M | $59.2M |
| Share price | $28.47 | $23.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.1% | −13.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.0% | −59.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 2,321 | 1,611 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.7× (better) | 11.2× |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.8× (better) | 5.3× |
| P/FCF | 11.8× | 5.2× (better) |
| PEG | 1.32 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.5% | 19.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $50.15 | $52.15 |
| Margin of safety | 43.2% | 54.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% (better) | −1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% (better) | −11.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4.4% (better) | −95.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 22.5% (better) | 10.8% |
| Net margin | 11.3% (better) | 2.8% |
| FCF margin | 9.2% (better) | 5.2% |
| Return on equity | 17.7% (better) | 3.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.6% (better) | 8.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.02 | 3.22 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× (better) | 1.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.45 (better) | 0.56 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.06 (better) | 0.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 15.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.52% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | −0.52% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.0% | 31.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 13.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$14.0K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- CSV stock overview
- CSV income statement
- CSV valuation and score
- RGS stock overview
- RGS income statement
- RGS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.