Crawford vs Ryan Specialty
CRD.A and RYAN side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRD.A and RYAN compare
Ryan Specialty is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as Crawford ($11.8B against $583M).
Ryan Specialty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.8% versus −3.6% for Crawford).
Ryan Specialty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.2% compared with 2.0% at Crawford.
Both pay dividends: Crawford yields 2.5% and Ryan Specialty 0.83%.
Crawford scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Ryan Specialty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRD.A | RYAN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $583M | $11.8B |
| Share price | $12.00 | $46.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.0% | −18.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 50.0% | 17.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.26 |
| Employees | 9,943 | 6,110 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 3.6× |
| P/B | 3.1× (better) | 26.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8× (better) | 31.1× |
| P/FCF | 8.1× (better) | 20.7× |
| FCF yield | 12.3% (better) | 4.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.6% | 9.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 24.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −19.9% | 51.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.2% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 15.6% |
| Net margin | 2.0% | 3.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.5% | 17.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.0% | 19.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.21 (better) | 8.23 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.57 (better) | 6.91 |
| Current ratio | 1.17 (better) | 1.01 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 (better) | 1.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% (better) | 0.83% |
| Payout ratio | 56.7% | 60.3% |
| Buyback yield | 5.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% (better) | 0.83% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.9% | 46.3% |
| Held by insiders | 26.8% | 57.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.2M (better) | −$229M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 12.5% |
Go deeper
- CRD.A stock overview
- CRD.A income statement
- CRD.A valuation and score
- RYAN stock overview
- RYAN income statement
- RYAN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.