Camden Property Trust vs Global Self Storage
CPT and SELF side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPT and SELF compare
Camden Property Trust is the larger company, worth 184 times as much as Global Self Storage ($10.0B against $54.1M).
On earnings, Camden Property Trust is cheaper: it trades at 9.2× trailing earnings, against 26.3× for Global Self Storage.
Camden Property Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (61.9% versus 0.46% for Global Self Storage).
Camden Property Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7485% compared with 16.0% at Global Self Storage.
Both pay dividends: Camden Property Trust yields 4.3% and Global Self Storage 6.1%.
Camden Property Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Global Self Storage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPT | SELF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.0B | $54.1M |
| Share price | $99.09 | $4.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.2% | −4.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −40.4% | −11.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 0.21 |
| Employees | 1,640 | 36 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.2× (better) | 26.3× |
| P/S | 667× | 4.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.7× |
| Fair value | $90.71 | $4.70 |
| Margin of safety | −9.2% | −0.77% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 61.9% (better) | 0.46% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 315% (better) | 13.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 334% (better) | 12.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.3% | 43.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 21.3% |
| Net margin | 7485% (better) | 16.0% |
| Return on equity | 24.6% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.13 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.3× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.21 | 2.14 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% | 6.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 40.5% | 161% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.8% (better) | 2.2% |
| Buyback yield | 7.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 11.3% (better) | 6.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 29.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 10.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.6M | $589K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 0.53% |
Go deeper
- CPT stock overview
- CPT income statement
- CPT valuation and score
- SELF stock overview
- SELF income statement
- SELF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.