Cooper-Standard vs Visteon
CPS and VC side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPS and VC compare
Visteon is the larger company, worth 5.9 times as much as Cooper-Standard ($2.0B against $336M).
Cooper-Standard grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.9% versus 1.9% for Visteon).
Visteon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −1.7% at Cooper-Standard.
Visteon pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Cooper-Standard does not pay one.
Visteon scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 5 for Cooper-Standard), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPS | VC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $336M | $2.0B |
| Share price | $18.93 | $80.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −34.4% | −25.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.8% | −33.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.35 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 22K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.8× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.4× | 5.9× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.74 |
| FCF yield | −8.4% | – |
| Fair value | – | $115.26 |
| Margin of safety | – | 30.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% (better) | 1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 8.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −36.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.0% (better) | 10.4% |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | – |
| Net margin | −1.7% | 4.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.81% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 10.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.23 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 10.21 (better) | −0.41 |
| Current ratio | 1.31 | 1.61 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 | 3.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 14.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 16.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.9% | 129% |
| Held by insiders | 5.5% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $225K (better) | −$11.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 16.8% |
Go deeper
- CPS stock overview
- CPS income statement
- CPS valuation and score
- VC stock overview
- VC income statement
- VC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.