Capri vs Tandy Leather Factory
CPRI and TLF side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPRI and TLF compare
Capri is the larger company, worth 120 times as much as Tandy Leather Factory ($2.2B against $18.5M).
On earnings, Capri is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 113× for Tandy Leather Factory.
Tandy Leather Factory grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.3% versus −4.2% for Capri).
Capri keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.1% compared with 0.22% at Tandy Leather Factory.
Tandy Leather Factory pays a dividend yielding 33.2%; Capri does not pay one.
Tandy Leather Factory scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Capri), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPRI | TLF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $18.5M |
| Share price | $21.46 | $2.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.8% | −23.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −65.7% | −54.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 0.38 |
| Employees | 11K | 538 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 113× |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 34.1× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.5× | 15.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.1× | – |
| PEG | – | 1.20 |
| FCF yield | 8.3% (better) | −0.57% |
| Fair value | $19.96 | – |
| Margin of safety | −7.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.2% | 5.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.1% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −98.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −98.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.3% (better) | 60.3% |
| Operating margin | 1.4% (better) | 1.1% |
| Net margin | 6.1% (better) | 0.22% |
| FCF margin | 5.4% (better) | −0.14% |
| Return on equity | – | 0.34% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.4% (better) | 1.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 7.38 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.14 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 4.69 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.51 (better) | 2.78 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 33.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 3480% |
| Buyback yield | 12.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 12.8% | 33.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 58.9% |
| Held by insiders | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 0.02% |
Go deeper
- CPRI stock overview
- CPRI income statement
- CPRI valuation and score
- TLF stock overview
- TLF income statement
- TLF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.