CNX Resources vs Matador Resources
CNX and MTDR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNX and MTDR compare
Matador Resources is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as CNX Resources ($6.6B against $5.2B).
On earnings, CNX Resources is cheaper: it trades at 5.9× trailing earnings, against 9.2× for Matador Resources.
CNX Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.0% versus 1.3% for Matador Resources).
CNX Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.2% compared with 18.6% at Matador Resources.
Matador Resources pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; CNX Resources does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNX | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.2B | $6.6B |
| Share price | $36.56 | $53.47 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.2% | 34.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 162% | 31.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 390 | 483 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 14 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 5.9× (better) | 9.2× |
| P/S | 2.0× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 3.1× |
| P/FCF | 10.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.2% | – |
| Fair value | $52.53 | $72.62 |
| Margin of safety | 30.4% (better) | 26.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.2% | 33.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 212% (better) | −7.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 332% (better) | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 31.6% |
| Net margin | 35.2% (better) | 18.6% |
| FCF margin | 18.6% | – |
| Return on equity | 20.4% (better) | 12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.47 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.26 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.08 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.37 (better) | 1.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 25.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Buyback yield | 10.2% (better) | 0.44% |
| Shareholder yield | 10.2% (better) | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.1% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 14.2% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.9M | $2.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.2% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- CNX stock overview
- CNX income statement
- CNX valuation and score
- MTDR stock overview
- MTDR income statement
- MTDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.