Context Therapeutics vs Pliant Therapeutics
CNTX and PLRX side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNTX and PLRX compare
Pliant Therapeutics is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Context Therapeutics ($43.2M against $16.6M).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNTX | PLRX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.6M | $43.2M |
| Share price | $0.181 | $0.697 |
| Change, 1 year | −84.7% | −61.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.3% | −95.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 15 | 49 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/B | 0.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | −205% | −155% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Return on equity | −84.3% | −55.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | −698.2× |
| Current ratio | 6.59 | 8.05 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −7.55 (better) | −7.99 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | −0.09% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.09% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 68.4% | 77.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$164K |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 9.1% |
Go deeper
- CNTX stock overview
- CNTX income statement
- CNTX valuation and score
- PLRX stock overview
- PLRX income statement
- PLRX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.