CenterPoint Energy vs PPL
CNP and PPL side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNP and PPL compare
CenterPoint Energy and PPL are about the same size, with market caps of $27.3B and $26.8B.
On earnings, PPL is cheaper: it trades at 21.1× trailing earnings, against 23.5× for CenterPoint Energy.
PPL keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with 11.8% at CenterPoint Energy.
Both pay dividends: CenterPoint Energy yields 2.2% and PPL 3.2%.
PPL scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for CenterPoint Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNP | PPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.3B | $26.8B |
| Share price | $41.19 | $35.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.1% | −3.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 55.1% | 25.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 3,712 | 6,546 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.5× | 21.1× (better) |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 2.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.2× (better) | 20.7× |
| PEG | 112.51 | 1.32 (better) |
| FCF yield | −10.4% | −7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $36.79 | $34.43 |
| Margin of safety | −12.0% | −3.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.8% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 10.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.5% | 28.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.8% | 27.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −3.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 100.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 24.4% (better) | 24.1% |
| Net margin | 11.8% | 13.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −28.8% | −21.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.02 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.61 (better) | 8.83 |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | 2.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.15 (better) | 0.91 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.88 | 0.98 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 52.3% | 64.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −8.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 3.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 91.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.30% | 0.17% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $40.7K (better) | −$441K |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.5% | – |
Go deeper
- CNP stock overview
- CNP income statement
- CNP valuation and score
- PPL stock overview
- PPL income statement
- PPL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.