Compass Minerals International vs Knife River
CMP and KNF side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMP and KNF compare
Knife River is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as Compass Minerals International ($3.3B against $969M).
On earnings, Knife River is cheaper: it trades at 23.8× trailing earnings, against 53.7× for Compass Minerals International.
Knife River grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus 5.5% for Compass Minerals International).
Knife River keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.2% compared with 1.4% at Compass Minerals International.
Knife River scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Compass Minerals International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMP | KNF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $969M | $3.3B |
| Share price | $23.08 | $58.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.1% | −18.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.1% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 1,849 | 5,298 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 53.7× | 23.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 3.7× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.3× (better) | 10.0× |
| P/FCF | 12.4× (better) | 76.9× |
| PEG | – | 2.28 |
| FCF yield | 8.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Fair value | $22.73 | $55.13 |
| Margin of safety | −1.6% (better) | −5.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 12.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −8.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −8.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.2% | 17.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.9% (better) | 8.3% |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 4.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Return on equity | 7.2% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.0% | 6.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.72 | 1.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.97 (better) | 3.23 |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | 3.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.01 | 2.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.94 | 2.34 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.6% | 96.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 0.70% |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 7.2% |
Go deeper
- CMP stock overview
- CMP income statement
- CMP valuation and score
- KNF stock overview
- KNF income statement
- KNF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.