Costamare Bulkers vs United Maritime
CMDB and USEA side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMDB and USEA compare
Costamare Bulkers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.3% compared with −16.4% at United Maritime.
Costamare Bulkers scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 0 for United Maritime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMDB | USEA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $19.79 | $2.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.2% | 58.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.24 | 0.42 |
| Employees | – | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | −16.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −622633% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −5.1% | −1.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.3% (better) | −16.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 4.1% |
| Return on equity | −10.9% (better) | −11.3% |
| Return on invested capital | −8.2% | −0.31% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.20 (better) | 1.32 |
| Interest coverage | −3.8× | −0.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.33 (better) | 0.96 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 21.1% | 6.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 25.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$442K | $52.0K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 20.2% |
Go deeper
- CMDB stock overview
- CMDB income statement
- CMDB valuation and score
- USEA stock overview
- USEA income statement
- USEA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.