Costamare Bulkers vs Flex LNG
CMDB and FLNG side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMDB and FLNG compare
Flex LNG keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.5% compared with −6.3% at Costamare Bulkers.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMDB | FLNG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $19.79 | $25.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.2% | −6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 15.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.24 | 0.66 |
| Employees | – | 9 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | −2.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 16.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −622633% | −36.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 55.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −5.1% | 50.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.3% | 21.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −10.9% | 10.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −8.2% | 8.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.20 (better) | 2.56 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 7.95 |
| Interest coverage | −3.8× | 1.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.33 (better) | 2.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 217% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 21.1% | 29.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 42.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$442K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 15.1% |
Go deeper
- CMDB stock overview
- CMDB income statement
- CMDB valuation and score
- FLNG stock overview
- FLNG income statement
- FLNG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.