Commercial Metals vs Metallus
CMC and MTUS side by side, both in steel works, blast furnaces, and rolling and finishing mills. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMC and MTUS compare
Commercial Metals is the larger company, worth 9.8 times as much as Metallus ($7.1B against $728M).
On earnings, Commercial Metals is cheaper: it trades at 11.0× trailing earnings, against 117× for Metallus.
Commercial Metals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 0.66% at Metallus.
Commercial Metals pays a dividend yielding 0.90%; Metallus does not pay one.
Commercial Metals scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Metallus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMC | MTUS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.1B | $728M |
| Share price | $64.68 | $17.57 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.3% | 8.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 84.4% | 16.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 14K | 1,865 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.0× (better) | 117× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 14.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.7% | – |
| Fair value | $69.76 | $17.46 |
| Margin of safety | 7.3% (better) | −0.61% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.5% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.9% (better) | 6.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 675% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 692% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.6% (better) | 8.2% |
| Net margin | 7.0% (better) | 0.66% |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | – |
| Return on equity | 14.8% (better) | 1.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.72 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.35 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.34 (better) | 1.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.63 (better) | 2.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | – |
| Payout ratio | 12.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.3% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.3% | 86.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.99% | 15.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2M (better) | −$2.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- CMC stock overview
- CMC income statement
- CMC valuation and score
- MTUS stock overview
- MTUS income statement
- MTUS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.