Circle8 vs Kforce
CIRC and KFRC side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CIRC and KFRC compare
Kforce is the larger company, worth 44 times as much as Circle8 ($984M against $22.4M).
Circle8 grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (80.5% versus 2.1% for Kforce).
Kforce keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.0% compared with −19.4% at Circle8.
Kforce pays a dividend yielding 2.9%; Circle8 does not pay one.
Kforce scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 4 for Circle8), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CIRC | KFRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.4M | $984M |
| Share price | $0.196 | $54.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −92.2% | 76.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −30.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 314 | 1,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 23.0× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | – | 7.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 114× |
| FCF yield | −104% | 0.88% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $45.69 |
| Margin of safety | – | −20.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 80.5% (better) | 2.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 321% (better) | −1.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 0.33% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 5.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −5.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.6% | 27.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.8% | 4.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −19.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.9% | 0.63% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 30.5% |
| Return on invested capital | −17.0% | 32.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −4.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 1.95 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.46 | 7.85 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 65.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.1% | 95.7% |
| Held by insiders | 57.4% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$651K | −$578K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- CIRC stock overview
- CIRC income statement
- CIRC valuation and score
- KFRC stock overview
- KFRC income statement
- KFRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.