StockData

CHS vs Global Partners LP

CHSCL and GLP side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CHSCL and GLP compare

Global Partners LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 10.6% for CHS).

CHS keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.8% compared with 0.93% at Global Partners LP.

Both pay dividends: CHS yields 7.9% and Global Partners LP 5.3%.

Global Partners LP scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for CHS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCHSCLGLP
Size and price
Market cap–$1.5B
Share price$23.69$43.47
Change, 1 year−7.5%3.5%
Change, 5 years−17.4%84.8%
Beta (5Y)0.100.73
Employees10K4,700
StockData Score
Total score1316 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score46 (better)
Dividend score33
Valuation
P/S–0.1×
EV/EBITDA–4.1×
P/FCF–4.4×
FCF yield–22.9%
Fair value–$104.65
Margin of safety–58.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.6%29.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.40%17.4% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)83.3%126% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin4.6%5.2% (better)
Operating margin1.5%1.5% (better)
Net margin2.8% (better)0.93%
FCF margin2.9% (better)1.4%
Return on equity9.6%–
Return on invested capital4.4%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.18–
Net debt / EBITDA1.41–
Interest coverage3.6×–
Current ratio1.68 (better)1.09
Altman Z-score–6.19
Piotroski F-score7 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield7.9% (better)5.3%
Shareholder yield7.9% (better)5.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions–49.9%
Held by insiders–12.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$7.3M
Short interest, % of float–0.74%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.