Chord Energy vs Matador Resources
CHRD and MTDR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHRD and MTDR compare
Chord Energy is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Matador Resources ($7.8B against $6.4B).
Chord Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.1% versus 1.3% for Matador Resources).
Matador Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.6% compared with 13.4% at Chord Energy.
Both pay dividends: Chord Energy yields 3.6% and Matador Resources 2.2%.
Chord Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Matador Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHRD | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $143.46 | $52.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 64.4% | 31.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.7% | 27.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 676 | 483 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 9.0× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.8× (better) | 3.0× |
| Fair value | $279.45 | $72.17 |
| Margin of safety | 48.7% (better) | 27.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 30.1% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 33.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 427% (better) | −7.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 22.8% | 31.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.4% | 18.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.0% | 12.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.6% | 16.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.22 (better) | 0.26 |
| Interest coverage | 14.3× (better) | 4.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.34 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.99 (better) | 1.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | 32.6% | 25.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Buyback yield | 5.4% (better) | 0.46% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.0% (better) | 2.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.9% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.93% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.7M | $2.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.0% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- CHRD stock overview
- CHRD income statement
- CHRD valuation and score
- MTDR stock overview
- MTDR income statement
- MTDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.