Community Healthcare Trust vs Strawberry Fields REIT
CHCT and STRW side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHCT and STRW compare
Community Healthcare Trust is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Strawberry Fields REIT ($430M against $178M).
On earnings, Community Healthcare Trust is cheaper: it trades at 22.4× trailing earnings, against 57.0× for Strawberry Fields REIT.
Strawberry Fields REIT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus 5.7% for Community Healthcare Trust).
Community Healthcare Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.8% compared with 1.8% at Strawberry Fields REIT.
Both pay dividends: Community Healthcare Trust yields 8.6% and Strawberry Fields REIT 5.3%.
Community Healthcare Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Strawberry Fields REIT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHCT | STRW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $430M | $178M |
| Share price | $15.01 | $12.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.2% | 6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −66.5% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.06 |
| Employees | 35 | 9 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.4× (better) | 57.0× |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 14.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 1.5× |
| PEG | – | 2.32 |
| Fair value | $24.51 | $60.06 |
| Margin of safety | 38.8% | 79.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 10.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.9% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −59.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −64.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −36.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 55.0% |
| Net margin | 16.8% (better) | 1.8% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% | 21.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 1.7× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.56 | 0.66 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.6% (better) | 5.3% |
| Payout ratio | 260% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 10 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.6% (better) | 5.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.8% | 29.4% |
| Held by insiders | 6.8% | 43.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $273K (better) | $60.0K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 1.5% |
Go deeper
- CHCT stock overview
- CHCT income statement
- CHCT valuation and score
- STRW stock overview
- STRW income statement
- STRW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.