Core AI vs uCloudlink
CHAI and UCL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHAI and UCL compare
Core AI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.3% versus −11.1% for uCloudlink).
uCloudlink scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Core AI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHAI | UCL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.185 | $0.224 |
| Change, 1 year | −94.5% | −90.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −100% | −91.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 42 | 429 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.3% (better) | −11.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 55.9% (better) | −1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 38.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 100% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −5.5% | 52.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −8.0% | 9.8% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 7.7% |
| FCF margin | – | 2.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 25.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 738% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −3.21 |
| Interest coverage | – | 40.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.1% | 0.02% |
| Held by insiders | 8.2% | 26.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $10.9K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | – |
Go deeper
- CHAI stock overview
- CHAI income statement
- CHAI valuation and score
- UCL stock overview
- UCL income statement
- UCL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.