StockData

CG Oncology vs Molecular Partners

CGON and MOLN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CGON and MOLN compare

CG Oncology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (184% versus −100% for Molecular Partners).

CG Oncology scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for Molecular Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCGONMOLN
Size and price
Market cap$6.4B–
Share price$72.61$3.09
Change, 1 year80.5%−27.3%
Change, 5 years–−70.4%
Beta (5Y)1.410.90
Employees14234
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)1
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1044×–
P/B6.5×–
FCF yield−2.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)184% (better)−100%
Profitability
Operating margin−4294%–
Net margin−3851%–
FCF margin−3068%–
Return on equity−28.3%–
Return on invested capital−2103%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−11.5×
Current ratio21.70 (better)7.27
Altman Z-score68.83–
Piotroski F-score1–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−7.6%–
Shareholder yield−7.6%–
Ownership
Held by institutions106%8.9%
Held by insiders17.3%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$20.0M–
Short interest, % of float12.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.