StockData

Codere Online Luxembourg vs Vivid Seats

CDRO and SEAT side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CDRO and SEAT compare

Codere Online Luxembourg grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.8% versus −23.4% for Vivid Seats).

Codere Online Luxembourg scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Vivid Seats), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCDROSEAT
Size and price
Market cap–$15.6M
Share price$8.35$1.39
Change, 1 year44.2%−85.3%
Change, 5 years−15.7%−99.4%
Beta (5Y)0.901.39
Employees369565
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)4
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.0×
FCF yield–−451%
Fair value–$57.43
Margin of safety–97.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.8% (better)−23.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average24.4%80.9% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−66.9%–
EPS growth (TTM)−62.5%–
Profitability
Operating margin2.7%–
Net margin0.61%–
FCF margin–−17.7%
Return on equity4.4%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Current ratio1.47 (better)0.47
Altman Z-score–−3.05
Piotroski F-score–2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–0.02%
Shareholder yield–0.02%
Ownership
Held by institutions–80.3%
Held by insiders1.7%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$205K−$2.5K (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.