Codere Online Luxembourg vs Grandstand
CDRO and GRSD side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CDRO and GRSD compare
Grandstand grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.1% versus 4.8% for Codere Online Luxembourg).
Codere Online Luxembourg scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for Grandstand), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CDRO | GRSD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $8.68 | $0.890 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.3% | −87.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −12.4% | −92.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 369 | 600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.8% | 30.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 24.4% | 42.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −66.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −62.5% (better) | −211% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 90.8% |
| Operating margin | 2.7% (better) | −19.2% |
| Net margin | 0.61% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 11.0% |
| Return on equity | 4.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −3.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.47 (better) | 0.59 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 30.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 43.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$205K | $30.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.4% |
Go deeper
- CDRO stock overview
- CDRO income statement
- CDRO valuation and score
- GRSD stock overview
- GRSD income statement
- GRSD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.