Cedar Realty Trust vs Global Self Storage
CDR.PB and SELF side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CDR.PB and SELF compare
Cedar Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as Global Self Storage ($235M against $54.1M).
Global Self Storage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.46% versus −8.7% for Cedar Realty Trust).
Global Self Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.0% compared with 7.2% at Cedar Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Cedar Realty Trust yields 7.9% and Global Self Storage 6.1%.
Global Self Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Cedar Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CDR.PB | SELF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $235M | $54.1M |
| Share price | $17.10 | $4.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.6% | −4.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −31.9% | −11.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| Employees | 55 | 36 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 26.3× |
| P/S | 8.3× | 4.2× (better) |
| P/B | 76.5× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.7× | 10.7× (better) |
| Fair value | $11.88 | $4.70 |
| Margin of safety | −44.0% | −0.77% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.7% | 0.46% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −8.4% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1735% (better) | 13.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −101% | 12.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 43.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 38.6% (better) | 21.3% |
| Net margin | 7.2% | 16.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 45.3% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 1.2× | 3.3× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.29 | 2.14 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.9% (better) | 6.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 161% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.9% (better) | 6.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 29.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.05% | 10.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.5K | $589K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.53% |
Go deeper
- CDR.PB stock overview
- CDR.PB income statement
- CDR.PB valuation and score
- SELF stock overview
- SELF income statement
- SELF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.