COPT Defense Properties vs Cousins Properties
CDP and CUZ side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CDP and CUZ compare
Cousins Properties is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as COPT Defense Properties ($4.9B against $3.7B).
On earnings, COPT Defense Properties is cheaper: it trades at 22.3× trailing earnings, against 329× for Cousins Properties.
Cousins Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 7.2% for COPT Defense Properties).
Both pay dividends: COPT Defense Properties yields 3.8% and Cousins Properties 4.3%.
Cousins Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for COPT Defense Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CDP | CUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.7B | $4.9B |
| Share price | $32.95 | $29.64 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.0% | 14.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 21.5% | −24.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 394 | 351 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.3× (better) | 329× |
| P/S | 4.6× (better) | 4.7× |
| P/B | 2.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× | 4.3× (better) |
| Fair value | $34.67 | $34.75 |
| Margin of safety | 5.0% | 14.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.2% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 6.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −74.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.3% (better) | −74.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.0% (better) | −31.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 68.4% |
| Operating margin | – | 68.3% |
| Net margin | – | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 0.32% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 4.0× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.94 | 1.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.8% | 4.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 1445% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.1% (better) | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.31% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M | −$178K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.4% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- CDP stock overview
- CDP income statement
- CDP valuation and score
- CUZ stock overview
- CUZ income statement
- CUZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.