Century Communities vs Smith Douglas Homes
CCS and SDHC side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and SDHC compare
Century Communities is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as Smith Douglas Homes ($1.5B against $81.2M).
On earnings, Century Communities is cheaper: it trades at 14.1× trailing earnings, against 16.5× for Smith Douglas Homes.
Smith Douglas Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.42% versus −8.2% for Century Communities).
Century Communities keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with 0.49% at Smith Douglas Homes.
Century Communities pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Smith Douglas Homes does not pay one.
Century Communities scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for Smith Douglas Homes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | SDHC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $81.2M |
| Share price | $53.06 | $9.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.4% | −46.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −27.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 484 | 510 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.1× (better) | 16.5× |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× | – |
| FCF yield | −5.8% (better) | −27.6% |
| Fair value | $43.95 | $10.90 |
| Margin of safety | −20.7% | 15.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.2% | 0.42% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −49.1% (better) | −56.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −45.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 18.2% |
| Net margin | 2.9% (better) | 0.49% |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | −2.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.2% | 6.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.86 | 1.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 32.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 14.6% |
| Held by insiders | 15.2% | 90.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M | $796K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 21.4% |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- SDHC stock overview
- SDHC income statement
- SDHC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.