Century Communities vs Cavco Industries
CCS and CVCO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and CVCO compare
Cavco Industries is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as Century Communities ($4.9B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Century Communities is cheaper: it trades at 13.7× trailing earnings, against 27.3× for Cavco Industries.
Cavco Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus −8.2% for Century Communities).
Cavco Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.7% compared with 2.9% at Century Communities.
Century Communities pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Cavco Industries does not pay one.
Cavco Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Century Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | CVCO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $4.9B |
| Share price | $51.36 | $644.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.7% | 14.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.6% | 121% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 484 | 5,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.7× (better) | 27.3× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2× (better) | 18.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 21.1× |
| FCF yield | −6.0% | 4.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $43.33 | $473.05 |
| Margin of safety | −18.5% (better) | −36.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.2% | 11.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 15.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −49.1% | −6.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −45.3% | −3.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 23.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 22.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 9.5% |
| Net margin | 2.9% | 7.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 9.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.2% | 16.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 22.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 337× |
| Current ratio | – | 2.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.84 | 9.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 32.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.3% (better) | 2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.7% (better) | 2.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 15.2% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M | −$2.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- CVCO stock overview
- CVCO income statement
- CVCO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.