StockData

Cryo-Cell International vs Celularity

CCEL and CELU side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CCEL and CELU compare

Cryo-Cell International is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Celularity ($39.1M against $20.4M).

Cryo-Cell International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.0% versus −58.1% for Celularity).

Cryo-Cell International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.2% compared with −246% at Celularity.

Celularity scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Cryo-Cell International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCCELCELU
Size and price
Market cap$39.1M$20.4M
Share price$4.85$0.630
Change, 1 year19.8%−62.5%
Change, 5 years−60.4%−99.1%
Beta (5Y)0.261.93
Employees72115
StockData Score
Total score27 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score01 (better)
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.3×1.1× (better)
EV/EBITDA41.0×–
P/FCF8.4×–
FCF yield11.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−2.0% (better)−58.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.27%13.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin78.5% (better)19.2%
Operating margin0.61% (better)−264%
Net margin−6.2% (better)−246%
FCF margin14.9%–
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA3.65–
Interest coverage0.1×–
Current ratio0.86 (better)0.11
Altman Z-score−0.06 (better)−16.48
Piotroski F-score5 (better)1
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions6.9%6.8%
Held by insiders41.7%–
Short interest, % of float0.26%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.